!meowlnir-v11:maunium.net

Meowlnir

79 Members
Discussion about Meowlnir | Latest release: v0.3.0 | https://github.com/maunium/meowlnir55 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
17 Mar 2025
@nex:nexy7574.co.uknex (she/it)🦈🐈️ It's definitely possible, but a lot of work 18:36:43
@nex:nexy7574.co.uknex (she/it)🦈🐈️and unreliable at best18:36:46
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸmandating that join events are signed helps a lot though because then you can restrict the number of users who can be involved in a leak18:37:07
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ* mandating that join events are signed helps a lot though because then you can restrict the number of banned members who can be used in a leak18:37:45
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ* mandating that join events are signed by a via server (or whatever it's called in knock) helps a lot though because then you can restrict the number of banned members who can be used in a leak18:38:05
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ* mandating that join events are signed by a via server (or whatever it's called in knock) helps a lot though because then you can restrict the number of members from banned servers who can be used in a leak18:38:31
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ* mandating that join events are signed by a via server (or whatever it's called in knock) helps a lot though because then you can restrict the number of members from banned servers who can be used in a leak without the leak being obvious18:38:41
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸthe issue is there are a few different ways for servers to pull in events so there's a lot of wiggle roam to troll everyone trying to look for a leak18:40:11
@tulir:maunium.nettulirthat size limit section is wrong18:40:21
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ* the issue is there are a few different ways for servers to pull in events so there's a lot of wiggle room to troll everyone trying to look for a leak18:40:22
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸit says that it is innacurate in the proposal18:41:07
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ

It is theorized by me completely from thin air

18:41:10
@strawberry:puppygock.gaystrawberryπŸ“ (it/pup/she/they) πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ πŸ’œ 🦴 (puppygock.gay)is there any reason why a server can't dedupe ACLs :blobcat_rich_monocle:18:41:32
@tulir:maunium.nettulirI think matrix.org's ACL event already has more than 512 entries18:41:51
@+:tomfos.trTom Foster [he/him]i wannit18:42:04
@tulir:maunium.nettuliryou should theorize from math instead of thin air18:42:04
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸyeah it's probably more likely double that but18:42:11
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸi shouldn't but i couldn't be bothered at the time and i disclosed that x318:42:26
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ* i shouldn't but i couldn't be bothered at the time and i did disclosed that x318:42:54
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ* i shouldn't but i couldn't be bothered at the time and i did disclose that x318:43:00
@tulir:maunium.nettulir64kb / 20 bytes per server = 3k18:43:17
@nex:nexy7574.co.uknex (she/it)🦈🐈️I currently have 968 ACLs in my offtopic room18:43:42
@tulir:maunium.nettuliror if someone attacked the system with max length domains (63 bytes + tld = 75 or so in total) the limit would be 87318:44:11
@tulir:maunium.nettuliryeah my ACL event is around 16kb with some 900+ entries18:44:57
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸokie18:46:10
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸi've added a comment to the MSC to update it next time i'm there18:46:35
@cat:feline.supportCatACL slots was Cats dumb break glass idea on this front at one point.18:58:32
@cat:feline.supportCatThat MSC is practically abandonware from cats perspective tho.18:58:40
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸit's probably the one that will get used just because it's the easiest19:00:28
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸunfortunatley19:00:34

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 11